NOW AVAILABLE!

NOW AVAILABLE!
A HERO'S SPARK: the final book in the Wicked Women series!
Showing posts with label Robin Hood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robin Hood. Show all posts

Thursday, September 30, 2010

Characters matter...even on Reality TV.

Good morning!
I am a devotee of the show "Survivor." That's not a secret. I was hooked from the start and I've watched virtually every moment of the show's 20+ seasons. Most recently, The Girl and I are watching the few seasons that are on DVD.

I signed up for Netflix, because I wanted to get every season of Survivor on DVD to watch the history of this magnificently popular show all over again. It surprised me that I was not able to get all the seasons. In fact, of the 20 seasons available, I'm really only able to get about six.

In a time when everything from TV movies to the cheesiest sit com get put on DVD, it was a very big surprise that not all the seasons were put on. Still, I've been watching the seasons I can watch, most recently, rewatching the awesome "All Stars" season, which we finished watching last night. But before we watched the finale of "All Stars" we watched episode three of the current season, as it aired on TV.



SPOILER ALERT:







NFL coach Jimmy Johnson got voted off last night. Now, I was very surprised the 66 year old TV commentator even went out there. Face it, Survivor is a young person's game. Each year the cast gets younger, and more photogenic, and the older folks are few and far between. In fact, this season, it's the old folks against the young folks. The age divisions are everyone 40 and up on the old team and everyone 30 and down on the young team.
Yep, 40, according to Survivor, is old.

Here's the problem with this concept. When you're casting a show, a reality show where you want diversity and interesting people, by limiting the age groups right out of the gate, you're just not going to get very interesting characters. And then the show is boring.


Jimmy Johnson was probably the most interesting character on the old team. First of all, the man might be a bajillionaire, and as a Packer fan, I've cursed him out all the years he coached the Cowboys. But as a player on Survivor, the man had skills. He could have done very well if the other completely predictable, completely BORING old farts hadn't voted him off last night. Marty, leader of the oldsters now, is just not that interesting. He's a middle aged white guy who managed to take out the one guy who knew what was what when it came to planning a strategy at challenges. And, since the tribe is old and crippled next to the younger group, without strategy, they have nothing. Personally, looking at the old tribe, the seven remaining members are either frustrated jocks who think they know it all and can do it all, or meek little women who will do what they're told. The old tribe members keep saying they're all leaders in their fields. Well, that's not what I'm seeing. I'm seeing boring women, boring, predictable guys, and a losing tribe. (Except for Fire Captain Tyrone, who is funny, and plays things close to the chest. Watch for him to do well.)

That brings me to the younger tribe, or as I like to call them, the rainbow of bad stereotypes. You've got Nay, the PE Teacher who spends a lot of time and energy being loud, rude, and very...what was the term she called herself last night? Oh yes, very HOOD. (hmmmm, an African American woman who is loud and wags her finger at people and is pushy? I think that was done really well before...by Alicia in Australia and All Stars. So Nay is just a copycat, and sort of a mean one at that. Boring.)


And then there's Fabio. That's not his real name, but he has long hair and is sort of pretty. So everyone calls him Fabio. He's also as dumb as a stump, so it wouldn't surprise me one second if he's forgotten what his real name is.

Again, the youngsters pretty much fall into two groups: Boring jocks who think they're going to win and "get with" the pretty girls, and, well, the pretty girls. There is the one girl who has one leg, and I give her a TON of credit for being out there, but other than having an artificial leg, there isn't anything interesting about her. I don't even remember her name.


So I watched the episode last night and thought, "well, the most interesting person just got voted off, and it's only week three." Then I watch the finale of All Stars, which, even thought I knew who would win, was far more interesting and fun to watch.



What's my point in all of this? Even in reality TV, you need good, interesting characters. You need characters people are interested in, characters people care about. Other than Tyrone, who has the best facial expressions I've ever seen, and who is the one person in Survivor who knows to keep his face SHUT at tribal council, there are no interesting characters on this season. Not yet. Maybe some of them will grow on me. Maybe I'll just stop watching this season.

It's the same for writing. If your characters aren't interesting, no one is going to read your book. You could have the most fascinating plot on earth. But if no one cares about the people in the plot, it won't matter. Meanwhile, if you have a skimpy plot, but really interesting characters, you may have success with the book.



TV, movies, books. It's all about the people. I've watched movies that were terrible...but I loved a certain character in that movie, and I cared about what happened to them. I've read books sometimes not because the plot is great, but because I'm really interested in a character. It might seem like the two go hand in hand, but that's not true.



Why was "Gladiator" the best movie of 2000? Not for the movie itself. There have been a million action movies, gladiator movies, war movies. The difference was Maximus. Producers later bemoaned the fact that they killed Maximus, because he was such a strong character they could have made another movie.



Why are certain characters made over and over? "Robin Hood?" Because we love Robin Hood. Good movie, bad movie, it doesn't matter. Robin Hood is an icon that people care about.


Sherlock Holmes is another one. Face it, those books are predictable. You're not reading Sherlock Holmes to see "if" he's going to solve the crime. You're reading, and you're watching the movies, because you love Sherlock Holmes.


So it's the character, my friends. Now go forth and write!

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

The eyes have...part one!

Good morning!

I have been watching some of my favorite movies with Girl Child lately. She likes it because it's the only time she, as a thirteen year old, is going to get a sniff of a rated R movie, and I like it because no one else in the family is interested in watching my big budget historical movies with me.

It started out easily enough. "Gladiator." "Braveheart." "King Arthur." (The one with Clive Owen.) Girl child developed a taste for big battle movies where the hero dies. She cried right along with me. (I'll admit it. I tear up every time I watch Gladiator. Can't help it.) So we delved into my extensive Civil War movie collection. "Glory." (That one shreds me too.)

But then she picked a rather odd movie the other night. "The Quick and the Dead." For those of you who have seen it, you know it's not a normal Western. It's not even a normal movie. In fact, it's actually sort of terrible, in spite of great performances from a trio of very talented actors: Gene Hackman, Leo DiCaprio, and Russell Crowe. (Girl Child and I both agree that Sharon Stone is fairly horrible in this.)

Girl Child didn't care for "Quick" quite as much as she did the others. But watching the movie led us to a great discussion about what makes a great character and what makes a great actor. She's an aspiring writer, so I was very impressed by her depth of understanding about what, visually, makes a character/actor great.

I've said it before, I'll say it again, I believe Russell Crowe is one of, if not the, greatest actor of all time. I know that here in the States, where we like our stars all nice and fluffy and very, very available every minute of every day, most folks are insulted by Russell's impatience with the endless media drech. (I'm not defending the phone incident, but I do understand it. And if you say you've never had the urge to chuck something at someone, then you're lying to yourself. We all have those feelings. We just don't have the media following our every move.)

But push all that aside for a moment and ponder this: as writers, we struggle to make our characters flesh and blood. The best authors create characters that the reader feels, understands, or even becomes. It's not an easy thing to do, to create a visual aspect on paper.
Which is why a great actor can make a character amazing with one blink of an eye. A picture is worth a thousand words, but an actor that can act with his or her eyes is worth millions. And there aren't many actors that are good at it. Russell Crowe is the master of acting with his eyes.
Don't believe me? Go see "Robin Hood." (And you Robin Hood pursists, get over yourselves. It's FICTION!) There is a romance, a full on hot and sticky romance smack dab in the middle of that movie. And it's a romance that only Russell Crowe and the amazing Cate Blanchett could pull off.

Why?

Because so very, very little is said. There's no hot sex scene, (They both are covered in filth for most of the movie...) no gauzy curtains and soft candle light. But you know the exact second Robin falls in love with Marian and vice versa simply by looking in their eyes. And by the time Robin says, "I love you," by that point you've melted in a puddle under your chair. Both actors play out the entire romance with their eyes. Few actors can do that, and even fewer writers can write that. It's a visual and it's a moment on film that is a rare treasure.

Which brings me back to "Quick." Why do I keep it in my collection? Again, because of what Russell Crowe does with his eyes. His part is pretty much the only one worth watching in the movie, and his scenes with Gene Hackman are worthy of watching. But when he faces Sharon Stone in the gun fight and he tucks his hands in his belt and pleads with her to shoot him...

Go get the movie. Skip everything until almost the end. Then, go and try to write that expression into your hero. Better yet, go watch "Robin Hood," because not only has Russell now perfected the art of eye acting, but he's up against a worthy actress who holds more than her own. And it's a good movie.

Come sit next to me. I'll be there!